Senate passes bill to regulate surrogacy in Louisiana

Louisiana will this month introduce regulations that prohibit gay couples and single men and women from commissioning surrogacy arrangements in the state, provided Louisiana Governer Bobby Jindal agrees to ratify Senate Bill 162.

The final version of  Bill 162 defines “intended parents” as “married persons,” effectively barring unmarried partners and same-sex couples from becoming parents through surrogacy.

Consequently, the legislation has been opposed by a diverse coalition of political, LGBT, women’s rights and religious groups, in what is a deeply conservative and traditional area of the United States.

At present there are no Louisiana state laws relating to surrogacy and, as such, surrogacy arrangements and associated contracts are not recognized by the state. This, proponents of the Bill argue, curtails the legal rights of surrogate mothers, spouses and intended parents alike.

The Bill’s sponsor, Democratic state Sen. Gary Smith, is understood to have introduced it largely based on personal experience. He and his wife conceived their two children with the help of an out-of-state surrogate mother.

The Bill’s progress through the legislative process was slowed earlier this year when a Republican state Representative, Frank Hoffman, tried to attach an amendment that, as New Orleans-based newspaper Times Picayanne suggested, ‘would cause the bill to self-destruct’ should the US Supreme Court overturn the Federal Defence of Marriage Act (DOMA).

DOMA has been in place since 1996 and prohibits the Federal Government from recognizing any marriage that is not between a man and a woman, even if gay marriage is legal in the couple’s home state. LGBT groups hope that the Supreme Court will therefore overturn Section Three of DOMA, so that Federal and State laws may be reconciled in respect of marital benefits and programs provided by the Federal Government, including taxation categories, social security benefits, healthcare benefits and hospital visitation rights. The Supreme Court is expected to make a ruling on the act this summer.

The removal of the Rep. Hoffman’s amendment to the Senate Bill, which would have identified marriage as only between a man and a woman, keeps the door open to gay couples who wish to commission surrogacy, but only if the U.S. Supreme Court overturns DOMA, therefore requiring Louisiana to recognize gay marriages performed in other states.

Other amendments to the Louisiana bill, including one requiring a doctor’s certification that the use of a surrogate is medically necessary for the parents to conceive, survived a committee review.

The Bill will now make its way to the office of the Governor of Louisiana, whose responsibility it is to sign the Bill into effect, if he so chooses.

If you would like to discuss your situation or you would like more information about surrogacy, please click here or email louisa.ghevaert@porterdodson.co.uk or telephone Louisa on +44 (0)207 222 1244.

Louisa Ghevaert addresses College of Medicine

Maintaining her long-standing commitment to lobbying healthcare professionals and legislators on the increasing importance of fertility law, Louisa addressed attendees at the College of Medicine’s Annual Conference yesterday.

The Conference, which this year focused on patient self-care, took place at the headquarters of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, in Regent’s Park, London. Key note speakers included Professor Graeme Catto, President of the College of Medicine, and Norman Lamb MP, the Coalition Government  Minister for Health.

Louisa addressed attendees as part of a session entitled ‘Self Care for Fertility’, focused on the important role played by the patient in determining the course of their family-building journey. Louisa’s presentation emphasised the need for clinicians, as well as patients, to consider the legal realities of what is often referred to as ‘fertility tourism’. At a time when growing numbers of UK couples seek fertility treatment outside the UK, at the recommendation of their healthcare professional or a fertility clinic, it is important that the legal complexities inherent in such arrangements are not forgotten in the wake of the increased ease with which surrogacy and other assisted reproductive treatments can be commissioned abroad.

Louisa’s address to the College of Medicine’s Annual Conference follows her presentation to the American Board of Attorneys (ABA) at their Spring conference in Alaska, earlier this year. Louisa will also be addressing the Autumn Conference of the American Academy of Assisted Reproductive Technology Attorneys (AARTA) in Charleston, South Carolina, later this year, maintaining the pressure required to ensure legislators at home and abroad recognise the growing importance of fertility treatment and surrogacy as an increasingly common solution to couples’ family building difficulties.

If you would like to discuss your situation in more detail, or you would like more information about UK fertility law, please click here or email louisa.ghevaert@porterdodson.co.uk or call +44 (0)207 222 1244.

Irish Government to Appeal Surrogacy Ruling

The Irish Government’s Department of Social Protection last week confirmed that it will appeal a landmark Supreme Court ruling that allowed the genetic mother of twin girls – born to the woman’s sister, who acted as surrogate – to be named as the legal mother on her twins’ birth certificates. The birth mother had supported the original application.

Announcing its intention to appeal, the Department of Social Protection said that, whilst it was “extremely mindful of the family at the centre of this case”, the Government had agreed the judgment was “of exceptional public importance” and therefore should be appealed.

However, the spokesperson was keen to point out that the move to appeal did not automatically mean that the Government opposed the outcome of the ruling, rather that the judgment “… raises important questions about how motherhood may be determined under Irish law,” and that, consequently, there are a number of important legal points of great public interest that require clarification.

The Department warned that the wording of the judgments could, in future, restrict the ability of the Irish parliament to legislate on surrogacy and the use of assisted reproductive technologies. At the time of writing, the Irish Justice Minister, Alan Shatter, is preparing a new Family Relationships and Children Bill for consideration before the Irish parliament, which it is expected will address issues surrounding surrogacy law.

At present, there are no laws governing surrogacy or other assisted reproductive treatments in Ireland. Consequently, it is expected that the Supreme Court will fast track the appeal, in circumstances where the solicitor for the couple at the centre of the case has already warned of possible delay the appeal process may cause her clients, however any fast tracked appeal may still take several years to conclude.

If you would like to discuss your situation or you would like more information about surrogacy, please click here or email louisa.ghevaert@porterdodson.co.uk or telephone Louisa on +44 (0)207 222 1244.

India to allow single people to access surrogacy?

According to a story in last Thursday’s India Express, with an unexpected shift in policy, India’s Ministry of Home Affairs has outlined proposals that will overturn restrictions preventing single foreign nationals from commissioning surrogacy arrangements in the country.

Regulations introduced late last year (discussed here), require that anyone wishing to enter India for the purposes of surrogacy must do so on a ‘medical visa’, which is available only to heterosexual couples of two years’ marriage. Consequently, singles and same sex couples, for whom India had become a favoured destination for surrogacy, have been all but barred from commissioning arrangements in the country.

This alleged policy u-turn sees the Indian ministry extending medical visas to single men and women, as well as married heterosexuals. Whilst the regulations will continue to prohibit gay and lesbian couples from obtaining the necessary documentation, the Indian Express has quoted a senior official as saying  that the changes will mean  ”one of the partners, either male or female, can get a medical visa.”

Single applicants will nonetheless still face the same hurdles as married heterosexual couples, requiring an official undertaking from the embassy of their country of origin confirming that surrogacy is a recognised practice in that country and that any future surrogate-born child will be granted nationality and citizenship, before being accepted for treatment at a licensed clinic.

In addition to these existing requirements, the Express confirms that there are further propsals to introduce compulsory DNA testing in order to establish a genetic link between the surrogate-born child and the commissioning parents and an undertaking from the intended parents that they will be responsibile for the care of the surrogate child.

The proposals were alleged to have been due to be approved after India’s Union Home Minister Mr Sushil Kumar Shinde returns from a visit to the US.

US surrogacy agent sentenced for defrauding intended parents

On Monday 13 May 2013, a US woman who defrauded intended parents, surrogates and financial institutions of $2.4 million, was sentenced to 5 years and 3 months in prison.

Tonya Collins, 37, of Modesto, California, established a surrogacy agency, SurroGenesis, which she used as a front to carry out a scheme to defraud prospective parents between November 2006 and March 2009, directing them to pay their funds into an independent personal property escrow company. During investigations by the FBI, it emerged that, in fact, Ms Collins owned the escrow company in question and had used the money deposited by intended parents to fund her lavish lifestyle. She is reported to have used the funds to purchase expensive cars, homes, jewellery, clothing and vacations for herself and others.

US Attorney Wagner said “Tonya Collins orchestrated a cruel fraud, the effects of which are still being felt by the victims. She not only stole victim’s funds from their escrow accounts, but in many cases caused other injuries to victims, permanently foreclosing certain victims’ ability to proceed with a surrogate pregnancy for which they had planned for many years.”

In addition to her prison sentence, Ms Collins has also been ordered to pay restitution to her victims. She will begin her jail term on 27 June 2013, whilst a hearing to determine restitution amounts due to each victim has been scheduled for 29 July 2013.

This case illustrates the palpable problems and risks associated with international surrogacy and unregulated surrogacy agencies. Whilst many intended parents have a positive surrogacy experience and achieve their goal of a much-wanted child, some (as in this case) are not so lucky.

If you would like to discuss your situation or you would like more information about surrogacy, please click here or email louisa.ghevaert@porterdodson.co.uk or telephone Louisa on +44 (0)207 222 1244.

Zachary Quinto: seeking the final frontier

Following her articles on Matt Bomer and Rosie O’Donnell, Louisa has penned Pink Parenting’s cover story for their May/June edition, this time on Hollywood’s hottest property, Zachary Quinto.

Zach is the co-lead in one of 2013′s most anticipated movies, Star Trek: Into Darkness, in which he has reprised his role as everyone’s favourite half-Vulcan, Spock.

Off-screen, though, Zachary remains a leading man. He became Hollywood’s first openly-gay blockbuster actor when he decided to come out in 2011; boldly going where no A-lister has gone before. His unique candour and public commitment to LGBT equality, combined with his commanding roles in cult franchises 24, Heroes, and, of course, Star Trek, has won him legions of dedicated fans.

Louisa’s article looks at Zachary’s journey to-date and where the now-happily-partnered actor might like to head next, as well as discussing some of the legal issues gay parents-to-be need to consider. To read the full article, click here.

Chinese crack down on surrogacy

The Chinese government recently rejected claims made in the media that it planned to lift legal restrictions that prohibit the practice of surrogacy in the country.

At present, there exists no Chinese law specifically relating to the practice of surrogacy. Instead, surrogacy is effectively prohibited by laws introduced in 2001, which ban the trade of fertilised eggs and embryos and therefore prevent hospitals from performing procedures that involve that process, such as surrogacy. As a result, the practice has been pushed underground.

In spring last year, the Chinese Health Ministry convened a panel of experts to discuss surrogacy and associated issues. This panel comprised experts in medicine, law and sociology, whose task was to evaluate surrogacy as an assisted reproductive technology, through the lense of Chinese ethics and tradition.

This move was prompted by a high profile surrogacy case involving a couple from the southern city of Guangzhou, who reportedly paid almost 1m yuan (£100,000) for the help of two surrogates to carry their eight babies simultaneously. In a country that has a single-child policy, practiced for several decades, this caused understandable concern to the government.

That case was unusual but it exposed the practice of surrogacy in China driven by economic benefits and the desire to have children. It is thought that 10 -15 % of China’s two billion population suffers with infertility. In 2010, the Guangzhou-based newspaper Southern Metropolis Weekly estimated that in the preceding 30 years there had been almost 25,000 children born through surrogacy in China.

Some Chinese surrogacy agencies advertise on the internet, where upwards of 30,000 intended parents gather in online chat communities. Some of these agencies provide a variety of surrogacy ‘packages’, from ‘economy’ to ‘luxury’, and will often fly surrogates abroad for the purposes of embryo transfer and fertilisation. This causes concerns about the treatment of surrogates and the care they are provided post-birth in circumstances where much of the practice takes place away from regulatory bodies. Some surrogates reside in ‘surrogate dorms’ for the duration of their pregnancy where they must adhere to a strict routine. This includes set sleeping periods and non-disclosure of the dorm’s location to friends and family members.

As such, the Chinese government’s expert panel was convened so as to coincide with a nationwide crackdown on violations of the 2001 laws, including those practicing surrogacy. In the intense media speculation that has followed, one of the expert panellists, a reproductive medicine professional, claimed that as a result of the panel’s findings it was likely that China would legalise surrogacy within 5 to 10 years. This has since been flatly denied by government spokesmen within the Health Ministry, who maintain that there will be no such changes to laws governing surrogacy.

Click here for more information about surrogacy law or contact louisa.ghevaert@porterdodson.co.uk or call +44 (0)207 222 1244.

Louisa Ghevaert lectures the American Bar Association on fertility law

Louisa was delighted to attend the American Bar Association’s Spring 2013 Family Law Conference in Anchorage, Alaska, last week where she gave a specialist fertility law lecture to leading assisted reproduction lawyers from around the world.

The ABA conference was well attended by specialist assisted reproduction and family lawyers from across the US and beyond and it offered a variety of speaking and training programmes on subjects as varied as developments in international assisted reproduction law to pet custody law and practice.

Louisa joined an international panel of specialist lawyers from Australia, Argentina and the US, all of whom provided updates on recent assisted reproduction case law and policy changes in what remains a fast moving area.  Louisa presented a comprehensive overview of the differing and often fragmented approaches to fertility and assisted reproduction law across Europe and the complex legal issues arising within the  international fertility sector. 

In the absence of international consensus on assisted reproduction law and policy, ABA’s commitment to assisted reproduction and its work within the global fertility sector plays a valuable role in improving awareness and understanding of the complex practical, legal and policy issues associated with fertility treatment, donor conception, surrogacy and alternative family formation.

The ABA conference was set against the stunning backdrop of the Alaskan landscape, which boasted unrivalled access to the state’s glaciers, coastline, flora and fauna.  The conference staged a breathtaking train trip along the coast, enabling lawyers to come together as a group to discuss their legal practice and share information as well as enjoy some of the world’s most beautiful natural heritage.

If you would like to discuss more information about the legal issues arising from fertility treatment, donor conception, surrogacy or alternative family formation please click here or email louisa.ghevaert@porterdodson.co.uk or call +44 (0)207 222 1244.